Patrick Tan
1 min readFeb 19, 2019

Dear Patrick,

a) Thank you for taking the time to point out these facts. Your are most right in pointing out that Polkadot’s ICO funds were not really hacked and any allusion I may have given to that was unintentional. Any error or omission remains mine.

b) Thank you also for pointing out Cosmos, its exclusion was not deliberate, but merely a function of oversight. Polkadot and Cosmos are similar in their goals perhaps but different in their approach to what seems to be an intractable problem. I appreciate their different methodologies and will be monitoring the ultimate success (or lack thereof) of both projects with keen interest.

I cannot thank you enough for contributing to the quality of the discussion and the very polite and amicable way you have pointed out the gaps in my approach and understanding.

Yours,

Patrick

Patrick Tan
Patrick Tan

Written by Patrick Tan

General Counsel for ChainArgos, the blockchain intelligence firm made famous for breaking the story that BUSD was unbacked by US$1.4bn

No responses yet

Write a response