Patrick Tan
1 min readMay 28, 2019

Dear Daniel,

Thank you for reading my work and thank you for taking the time to contribute to the discussion.

You are absolutely right that the hacking of a centralized and ergo non-infrastructural piece of the Bitcoin blockchain should have naught to do with the overall price of Bitcoin.

Yet I am continually surprised with how often pundits, reporters and journalists regularly link one factor or another to create the illusion where correlation implies causation.

Yet at the same time, because so many mainstream media outlets attribute a falling (or rising) price of Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies to some factor which sounds reasonable, the undiscerning may be led to assume causation, where in fact there may have been none at all.

Which is why I love cryptocurrencies so much — they’re what you make of it. An unconstrained asset (if you will) which have the potential to be anything.

Thank you for elevating the quality of the commentary and I look forward to hearing from you again.

Yours,

Patrick

Sign up to discover human stories that deepen your understanding of the world.

Free

Distraction-free reading. No ads.

Organize your knowledge with lists and highlights.

Tell your story. Find your audience.

Membership

Read member-only stories

Support writers you read most

Earn money for your writing

Listen to audio narrations

Read offline with the Medium app

Patrick Tan
Patrick Tan

Written by Patrick Tan

General Counsel for ChainArgos, the blockchain intelligence firm made famous for breaking the story that BUSD was unbacked by US$1.4bn

No responses yet

Write a response